<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strategically Eloquent &#187; executive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/tag/executive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog</link>
	<description>Internal Communication et al.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blog editors deliver value</title>
		<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/29/blog-editors-deliver-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/29/blog-editors-deliver-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leader communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eloquor.com/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My client team has confirmed for me my long-believed theory that having an editor on a blogging project makes good business sense. I&#8217;ve been serving as an editor for this team of executive bloggers for several months. One of them told me yesterday that at the outset, he thought it was an unnecessary role. To [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/29/blog-editors-deliver-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To blog or not to blog&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/10/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/10/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intranet and Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eloquor.com/blog/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing conflicting reports. There was the article I read recently from Wired that said if you haven&#8217;t started a blog, forget it. Blogging is passe. Now, it&#8217;s all about Twitter and Facebook. A couple of weeks ago, both Ragan and Melcrum were all about blogging. Even CEO blogging. Based on the experience I&#8217;m having with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/10/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
