<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strategically Eloquent &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/tag/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog</link>
	<description>Internal Communication et al.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IT as strategic partner – leadership op for communicators</title>
		<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/14/it-as-strategic-partner-%e2%80%93-leadership-op-for-communicators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/14/it-as-strategic-partner-%e2%80%93-leadership-op-for-communicators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internal Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eloquor.com/blog/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just did a new post on the Communitelligence Communication Skills Blog. We&#8217;ve been doing a lot of work lately with IT professionals and last week a colleague put out a query about working with IT. It is obviously a hot topic. Some of what I talk about in my post is reflected in this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/14/it-as-strategic-partner-%e2%80%93-leadership-op-for-communicators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App vs Intranet Governance: Chicken or Egg?</title>
		<link>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/15/app-vs-intranet-governance-chicken-or-egg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/15/app-vs-intranet-governance-chicken-or-egg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intranet and Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web governance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eloquor.com/blog/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which really did come first?&#8230; OK, I can answer my own question: application governance came first. IT has always been very organized and very linear. They document well. But they are primarily focused on the widgets – the apps and other sparkly things. &#8220;Ooo,glittery.&#8221; Accountability is often lousy. Everyone&#8217;s thinking it, I&#8217;m just saying it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eloquor.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/15/app-vs-intranet-governance-chicken-or-egg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
